Once you enable Facebook's two-factor authentication, which we strongly recommend, Facebook will ask you for a security or confirmation code to log in from a new location or device. Read our guide on two-factor authentication and why you should use it to learn more about this security method. Without two-factor authentication, you only need your username or email address and password to log into your Facebook account.

Six Digit Confirmation Code For Facebook Hackl

DOWNLOAD: https://persifalque.blogspot.com/?d=2tLLEE

We went with the Text Message option and entered the six-digit code Facebook texted to our mobile number. You can use a phone number already associated with your account or add a new one. Once you've entered the Facebook confirmation code, click Finish to complete the initial setup.

Do you still have access to the mobile phone number you included under two-factor authentication? Maybe your provider could send you a new SIM with the same number. In that case, let Facebook text you a confirmation code. Unfortunately, Facebook can only use that one number for two-factor authentication, even if you've set up other phone numbers under your profile.

You can also access the above recovery route through any browser, on desktop or mobile. Go to m.facebook.com and log into your account using your mobile number, email, or username and password. When prompted for the login code, click Having trouble? > I don't have my phone > Continue.

Scammers are now trying to make you prove who you are in a multi-step scam. They'll send you a text message with a six-digit Google Voice verification code and ask you for that code. If you give it to them, they'll try to use it to create a Google Voice number linked to your phone number.

One of the easiest 2FA methods is to use a code generator app like Authy. These apps provide a random set of six-digit codes that allow access to hundreds, if not thousands, of websites. This is one of the simplest ways to enable 2FA, but it requires that you have access to your phone or tablet.

I have heard a story, which possibly may be apocryphal, that we are saddled with four-digit PINs because the engineer who originally invented the ATM asked his wife how long the card security codes should be, and she was quite unshakably certain that she could never POSSIBLY remember a number longer than four digits.

--Some services such as Gmail even give you the option of using two passwords when you use a particular computer or device for the first time. If you have that feature turned on, the service will send a text message with a six-digit code to your phone when you try to use Gmail from an unrecognized device. You'll need to enter that for access, and then the code expires. It's optional, and it's a pain -- but it could save you from grief later on. Hackers won't be able to access the account without possessing your phone. Turn it on by going to the account's security settings.

Q: how to track second order effects of people gaming the survey?A: took precautions: didn't have to answer and could drop out (some peopledid), said who they are, didn't ask for demographic data (people didn'tlike this in pilot studies), out of 1000 people only 2-3 very negativecomments, perhaps 50 saying this is really good and worth studying, peoplethought a lot about the answers and made them think about this data. Q: Survey was about banking but did you ask about how many unique accountsetc do they have?A: asked what they reuse PINs for (e.g., smartphone, gate code), asked ifsame PIN used for multiple cards (about 2/3rds said yes)Jean Smart: is this biased against less paranoid? Also if you call yourselfengineer, they are statistically most trusted group.A: might be biased against less paranoid given demographics of who takesMTurk survey. Q: moving toward larger PINs, customers would often choose 4-digit PINs andadd \"11\" or \"12\" if they need 6-digit PIN. A: Switching to more digits doesn't work - CMU looked at this in password.Switching to random PINs even if short (3 digit) would be better than longerPINs. History of banking is moving towards 4-digit PINs chosen by user.Session: Securing the Stock MarketsSession Chair: Sonia ChiassonThe Postmodern Ponzi Scheme: Empirical Analysis of High Yield InvestmentProgramsTyler Moore, Jie Han and Richard Claytonpresenter: Jie HanHigh yield investments promise multiple percentage interest _per day_. Alsoknown as Ponzi or pyramid schemes. Advertised as legitimate investments evenwhen they aren't and a sophisticated ecosystem set up surrounding them. Oneexample is Macrotrade, which claims to be certified by Comodo (a CA).Similar to Paypal but you probably haven't heard of them... These aredominated by two payment mediators (based in Costa Rica and Panama).Observed 1500 HYIP programs and over 140K events. Found they were reportingon same set of data but not always agreeing - shows collusion probably nothappening. They agree about 80% of the time. HYIPs tend to collapse within afew weeks - 50% last 50 days or less, but some last over a year. Collapsedue to unsustainable return rates among other factors. Users are less likelythan aggregators to give a bad rating and more likely to give good. Don'ttrust previous investors, but maybe the aggregators. Impacted based on modelis estimated at $6 million/month. Thousands of these are online, somepersisting for years. The reputation ecosystem produces mostly reliableassessments, but don't trust users. Future goals include an interactiveweb-based visualization and a way for linking scams together.

They tested three different distances: 10 miles (not in proximity). In the same room: 85%success rate. On the same university campus: high 70%, large distance: doesnot compute to same place. each test was then repeated 5 times whichprevented any false results.Q: What happens on the borders of LAC?A: Reasonable that it is not a problem.Q: How far apart towers are affect results?A: Have not tested this yet. Q: Any plans to do CDMA?A: Chose GSM due to currently possessed equipment. Should work on CDMA.Q: Is the modifications of the phones available/ can we use it?A: I can point you to who did the modifications of the phonesMetrics for Measuring ISP Badness: The Case of Spam (Short Paper)Benjamin Johnson, John Chuang, Jens Grossklags and Nicolas Christinpresenter: Benjamin JohnsonThis talk describes the problem of spam and focuses on the bad ISPs andwhether they can be taken down to prevent the spam. They revealed a coupleinteresting statistics including that spam comprises 90% of all email andcosts businesses $100B a year. It is difficult to manage by only therecipient. They propose that filtering the spam would be better. However,this is made more difficult by bad ISPs. The ISPs can do something about theoutbound spam. The majority of spam is from a few IP addresses controlled bya few ISPs.A question raised during this research is what is the legal issues regardingremoving a ISP. To determine whether an ISP can be removed they used a fewmetrics. The exclusive customer cone is the set of customers which will becut off if the ISP is removed. Exclusive customer prefix size, how manylarger customers are included in that cut off. They also keep track of howmany bad users there are and what the ratio of good to bad users is.For their tests they did not include forged headers since 80% of spam doesnot have forged headers. They used spam email headers to deal determine IPs(for un-forged headers). They used the spam database which Georgia Techgathered from july 2008 to january 2010. They used databases to determinethe metrics listed above. Their results show some ISPs which spam comes fromare needed but at least one could be removed; judged by the amount of spamvs legitimate data.Q: ?A: Some mechanism to put pressures on the ISP and shut it downCongestion-aware Path Selection for TorTao Wang, Kevin Bauer, Clara Forero and Ian Goldbergpresenter: Tao WangThis talk was on finding the least congested routes in Tor. Tor is an onlinerouting system for preserving the clients privacy. They presented twoalgorithms for finding these routes. The first algorithm, circuit choosing,works as follows: the clients pre-build and maintain a number of circuits.Use circuit which has the least amount of congestion. Reduces the durationtime by about 1/2. Some overhead was needed for gathering the informationneeded for this algorithm. The second algorithm was called \"circuitdropping\": If the route has too much congestion then pick a new route. Thisreduces the time by about 1/2 as well. There is no overhead.They also have a long term path suggestion algorithm. Since some relays(i.e. users) may always be congested, they find and remove them from use.However probing these may have a large amount of overhead. They use theroute overhead to determine a relay's overhead. If the relay keeps a historyof congestion then they remove it. They were able to reduce long term pathby 10%. General attacks are not affected by their approach. There are specificattacks against the long term path selection since an attacker can floodnodes which causes those nodes to be slower, however this does notdramatically decrease the run time.Ross Anderson: 25 years ago people use to do \"sticky routing\" use routeuntil congested, can this be applied? A. this fits into route dropping.Q: What if a large number of users use this process? Won't this prevent itfrom working?A: Guess the benefit will not be as great but still use the routes more evenly.Q: reverse of smear attack, make a relay look better than everyone else?A: best way to avoid this is to drop that particular circuit.Session: AuditingSession Chair: Nicolas ChristinAttacking the Washington